Odaily News Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr posted on the Additional data size limit when relaying or mining transactions. Inscription circumvents this limit by obscuring its data into program code. This vulnerability was recently fixed in Bitcoin Knots V25.1. Thanks to my work late last year The process was severely disrupted (V24 was skipped entirely) and the fix took longer than usual. There is still a vulnerability in Bitcoin Core in the upcoming V26 release. I can only hope that it will be finally fixed before V27 next year.”

Odaily News Solana Labs co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko said on the Unchained podcast that Solana will support NFT and hopes to provide a low-cost and fast solution. Inscription is a fully blockchain-based asset and, while less necessary, Solana will still provide support.

Odaily News Slow Mist founder Yu Xian posted on the The vulnerability of Bitcoin is a Spam attack. I personally feel that there is no need to fix this. The introduction of Taproot (a good thing) and the impact of accidentally opening this magic box is not only a pile of Spam, but also the activity of the Bitcoin ecosystem. , this ecosystem is not just about serial numbers/inscriptions. Of course, if this is fixed, there can be compatibility solutions to better open up the Bitcoin ecosystem, and the long-term pain is worse than the short-term pain. Previous news, Bitcoin core developer Luke Dashjr A post on the additional data size limit. By obscuring its data into program code, Inscription circumvents this limit. This vulnerability was recently fixed in Bitcoin Knots V25.1. My workflow was severely disrupted due to late last year (V24 was completely Skip), the fix is ​​taking longer than usual. Bitcoin Core is still vulnerable in the upcoming V26 version. I can only hope that it will be finally fixed before next year’s V27.”

A netizen from Odaily News asked: If the inscription wants to continue, a more environmentally friendly way is to create an inscription chain, similar to Ethereums Layer 2. This chain only needs to submit hashroot to Bitcoin regularly to run. Right? Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr replied: Yes, that would work. Then it doesnt even need to have a block size limit at all, each node can set its own limit value (or no limit at all) ).” According to previous news, Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr posted on the Core allows users to set additional data size limits when relaying or mining transactions. Inscription circumvents this limit by obscuring its data into program code. This vulnerability was recently fixed in Bitcoin Knots V25.1. Since going My workflow was severely disrupted at the end of the year (V24 was skipped entirely) and the fix took longer than usual. Bitcoin Core is still vulnerable in the upcoming V26 release. I can only hope it will be finalized before next years V27 Fixed. In response to netizens comments, Luke Dashjr said that after the vulnerability is fixed, it means that Ordinals and BRC-20 will no longer exist.

Odaily News In response to Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr’s post about “Inscription is using Bitcoin Core vulnerabilities to send spam to the blockchain”, OKX CEO Star commented: “Will this force the Bitcoin Inscription community to migrate to src20 or Lightning Network taproot assets? Regardless, OKX will continue to build an ecosystem that supports Bitcoin. Earlier today, Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr posted on the X platform: Inscription is leveraging Bitcoin Core customers A vulnerability in Bitcoin Core spams the blockchain. Since 2013, Bitcoin Core has allowed users to set additional data size limits when relaying or mining transactions. By obfuscating its data into program code, the inscription bypasses Past this limit. This vulnerability was recently fixed in Bitcoin Knots V25.1. Due to severe disruption to my workflow late last year (V24 was skipped entirely), the fix took longer than usual. In the upcoming V26 release , Bitcoin Core is still vulnerable. I can only hope that it will be finally fixed before V27 next year.”

Odaily News Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr replied on the When asked about exiting the majority consensus? Dashjr replied: We dont have to eliminate all inscriptions to bring benefits to Bitcoin. (We dont have to eliminate all Inscriptions to provide benefit to Bitcoin)

Odaily News Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr posted on the X platform that Ordinals is just a scam.

OdailyX platform user @combo_wizard posted: Are you worried about Lukes claim that BRC-20 is a scam and his plan to prune inscriptions in the blockchain? Dont worry, there is another one named Stamp ( SRC-20) of the Bitcoin protocol will not be pruned. Bitcoin Core developer Luke commented: “Just another scam.”