Everything that swipes the screen must have a reversal.
In the report on "snatching business license" on the afternoon of the 8th, exciting fake news such as "sixty men" and "arrested" emerged one after another. But when Caixin’s objective and true reports were released, no one paid attention to them. In addition, Caixin paid for reading, so there were even fewer followers.
image description
(picture from Caijing.com)
Regarding the snatching of the business license, according to the initial media reports, it extended from Li Guoqing's "four big men" to Wu Jihan's "sixty big men". However, the video that came out of the scene was obviously a confrontation between the two parties, and the number of people was only a dozen or so. The "sixty men" came out of nowhere.
Subsequent Caixin reports and feedback from people at the scene confirmed that there were only a dozen people present, and both sides were equipped with security measures.
Later, according to another media report, an insider said that Bitmain CFO Liu Luyao was arrested by the police for organizing the snatching of business licenses, and then the Internet went crazy. But anyone with a little common sense knows that "arrest" needs the approval of the procuratorate before it can be implemented. Just by looking at the words, you can tell that it is fake news spread by "informed people".
However, according to Caixin's report and people on the scene, the fact is that Ketuan Zhan, two lawyers, Liu Luyao and the staff of the Market Supervision Bureau of Haidian District all went to Beijing Shangdi Center Police Station to take notes. Jen's attorney on staff.
Regrettably, Wu Jihan relies too much on Caixin, which is objective and neutral, but has insufficient dissemination power and slow speed due to paid reading; Zhan Ketuan, his lawyers, and public relations personnel continue to release false information to the media, including pictures and videos, Take advantage of speed and flow.
In the end, the fake news that Wu Jihan was released by Ketuan Zhan created an image of hiring gangsters and provoking government departments. "Bad money drives out good money" has been fully exposed in the information and public relations war.
Speaking of the whole story of the incident, the real situation is also very simple.
Bitmain is a subsidiary of Cayman controlling Hong Kong and Hong Kong controlling the mainland, so the legal battle between Zhan Ketuan and Wu Jihan should be in Cayman. The core of the dispute is that Wu Jihan convened a general meeting of shareholders and removed Zhan Ketuan’s voting rights in the Cayman board of directors , whether the general meeting of shareholders is valid. But why is there such a huge feud in Beijing?
image description
(The picture shows the administrative reconsideration letter, from WeChat circle of friends)
The reason is that due to the inside information that we cannot know, Wu Jihan believes that Ketuan Zhan used "illegal", that is, administrative or relational power to operate. In fact, the legal profession generally believes that administrative reconsideration is "the people sue the government", and the winning rate is extremely low, but it is extremely rare for Ketuan Zhan to win twice in a short period of time.
Bitmain insiders revealed that after 18 years, Ketuan Zhan has been obsessed with government relations, and even often "gifts" mining machines to relevant people. Wu Jihan is not good at this.
Wu Jihan may think that legal means may not be able to solve the problem in Haidian, so he launched an alternative plan, that is, to establish a new subsidiary in Chongqing. At present, employees of Beijing Bitmain are also signing new labor contracts one after another.
It is also very simple why the issue of ownership and "snatching" of the business license arises.
Ketuan Zhan won the administrative reconsideration, so he believes that the business license belongs to him; but Jihan Wu believes that Beijing Bitmain is only a subsidiary of Hong Kong and Cayman, and the management right of the company belongs to him, and the business license and official seal naturally belong to him.
Lawyer Huo Yijie told Wu Shuo Blockchain that if the company's articles of association do not clearly stipulate the ownership of the official seal and business license, it is often in a blank area, and competition is a common phenomenon.
On the morning of May 9, Ketuan Zhan also posted on Moments, showing that the Beijing Bit legal person has been changed to him. But it also shows that the 100% shareholder of Beijing Bit is still Hong Kong Bit controlled by Wu Jihan.
At present, Bitmain should be changing the legal person of Beijing Bitmain through Hong Kong again, and Ketuan Zhan should report the loss and apply for a new business license. You can continue to pay attention to how it develops in the future.
