Let me talk about the conclusion first. In Wu Shuo's view, Ketuan Zhan unilaterally released false news to the media, thereby guiding public opinion. However, Caixin's objective reports cannot be known to the public because they paid for it, thus causing all kinds of rumors.
False news 1: At about 11:00 am on May 8, when I received the business license of Beijing Bitmain Company whose legal person is Ketuan Zhan at window No. 52 on the second floor of the Haidian District Government Service Center, the business license was stolen by a group of unidentified big men from industry and commerce administrators. snatched from hand. An on-site source told Lian Shang Cai Cai that the group of unidentified big men was about 60 people, of whom Liu Luyao was in command at the scene.
Fact: Many people from both sides were present. According to Caixin reports, one party involved is Bitmain’s chief financial officer and legal representative Liu Luyao, who was entrusted by Bitmain’s founder Wu Jihan who was not present; the other party was arrested in 2019. Ketuan Zhan, another founder of the company, and his two lawyers were expelled. There were more than a dozen unidentified people at the scene. People at the scene told Wu Shuo Blockchain that: both sides have security personnel, and some of the big men were actually hired by Zhan Ketuan. After both parties reported to the police, the police first asked Zhan Ketuan’s lawyer to leave, but Zhan Ketuan’s lawyer refused to leave and cursed Haidian. The staff of the District Industrial and Commercial Supervision Bureau were later forcibly taken away by the police.
The robbing by the Sixty Han is even more nonsense. The situation at the scene was "according to the decision of the Beijing Bureau of Justice, the business license is to be issued to the registered legal representative of the company, and the (previous) business license must be returned within a time limit." Just as the staff of the Haidian District Market Supervision Administration finished reading the notice , when the business license was about to be handed over to Ketuan Zhan, people from Bitmain suddenly snatched it back. Caixin reporter heard Liu Luyao say: "The business license belongs to the company's property, how can it be handed over to an individual!"
False news 2: On May 8, people familiar with the matter said that Liu Luyao, the former legal representative of Bitmain, was arrested by the police because he directed the snatching of the business license of Bitmain, whose legal representative is Ketuan Zhan. Even if Ketuan Zhan is mistakenly registered as the legal representative of Beijing Bit, Hong Kong Bit can remove him again according to law.
Fact: According to Caixin reports, Ketuan Zhan, two lawyers, Liu Luyao, and the staff of the Haidian District Market Supervision Bureau all went to Beijing Shangdi Center Police Station to take notes and cooperate with the investigation. Afterwards, some media reported that Liu Luyao was arrested by the police, and Bitmain replied that it was purely a rumor and that it would reserve the right to hold accountable those who made the rumors.
The doubts of the outside world are also revealed in Caixin's article, that is, why Ketuan Zhan was able to succeed in administrative reconsideration.
According to Caixin reports, the reason for the administrative reconsideration proposed by Zhan Ketuan is that Article 5 of the "Shareholder Decision" document submitted when registering the change of the legal representative "agree to amend the company's articles of association" was smeared out and stamped with the changed company Beijing Bitmain The official seal, which caused the registration change to be invalid due to the procedure. When registering for the first time to submit the resolution of the shareholders meeting, because the market supervision bureau system template was used to print the document, there was a sentence "agree to amend the company's articles of association". The staff of the Haidian District Market Supervision Bureau reminded on the spot that there was no need to amend the articles of association this time. So it was altered on the spot and confirmed with the official seal. "Now in response to the country's call to optimize the business environment, let the people and enterprises run at most once. We can't let us go back and reprint, seal and sign for this sentence."
It sounds complicated, but the truth is simple. The shareholders of all Bit companies in mainland China are Hong Kong Bit, and the shareholders of Hong Kong Bit are Cayman. As long as Ketuan Zhan cannot win the lawsuit in Cayman, the management rights of all companies in Hong Kong and the mainland are currently on Wu Jihan's side. As for what Ketuan Zhan used""Illegal" means of administrative intervention are unknown.
Caixin quoted Yin Jitao’s opinion and pointed out that the industrial and commercial registration of any company, including Bitmain, to change the legal representative’s registration is a declarative registration rather than a rights-setting registration. Therefore, the Beijing Haidian District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau's act of registering the change of Bitmain's legal representative is not an act of granting Bitmain's new legal representative rights. objectively register the facts and publicize them to the public. Even if the Haiding District Market Supervision Administration revoked the industrial and commercial registration of Bitmain’s change of legal representative through the administrative reconsideration procedure, the new legal representative appointed according to Bitmain’s internal effective resolution on changing the legal representative can fully represent Bitmain the will to exercise internal and external rights.
