Original source:VION WILLIAMS
Original source:
first level title
Best wishes!
01
Abuse of Voting Governance
text
When LX DAO cast an abstention vote, multiple jumps to interactive confirmation triggered me to continue to think about a proposition that I hadn’t thought about deeply before. There is no voting governance mechanism.
Subsequently, some discussions were initiated in the DAOs to World community, and some of the discussions were intercepted to show why the non-voting governance mechanism is a proposition worth exploring in the current DAO field.
Voting is a means, not an end;
Abuse of voting leads to blurring of the boundaries of member responsibilities;
Executive voting weakens executive squad leadership,
The tacit understanding and trust of team execution are not established by voting;
...
All in all, voting action does not mean democratic autonomy, and voting action is only one of the optional governance methods of democratic self-government regimes.
secondary title
Questions about Democracy
Although voting governance is the default governance method of DAO, in the Web3 brand market plan I recently explored, assuming the large-scale application of the DAO model in the Web3 brand market, in addition to the mnemonic problem, the voting problem of DAO is also an obstacle to scale big problem.There are many ways to solve a problem, and directly bypassing this problem is also a way, so you might as well assume boldly, what is the governance mechanism that does not require voting? Whether there are conditions for the establishment of possibility and rationality.Instead of discussing increasing the turnout rate and lowering the voting threshold, it is better to directly think about the necessity of voting from the root cause,
Can an organization function without voting decisions? Is the voting system the only and necessary way to embody democracy?But before that, I also want to briefly mention why DAO has turned into a state of silence with the bear market not long after the rise of Web3. The core key is that the DAO field is subject to the historical limitations of Athenian democracy.
Limited by the paradox of decentralization and centralized governance caused by voting governance, the pace of innovation has been trapped in repeated free exploration.
Therefore, we start from theory, starting from Athens democracy, discuss the theoretical basis of a democratic society, and learn from the history of DAO’s experience in building a democratic system.
secondary title
Political structure of the city-state of Athens
We are obsessed with the democratic governance mechanism of Athens, which has indeed created a beautiful and ideal city-state recorded in history books, and has been widely praised throughout history. However, if we want to realize this governance model of Athenian democracy, it is still necessary for us to understand the creation and operation mechanism of Athenian democracy.The establishment of Athenian democracy requires several key conditions,The citizens of Athens are first and foremost a political community,The community follows the same constitution and moral laws. Secondly, citizens of Athens have complete citizenship protection. From the schematic diagram, we can see the basic model of democratic governance in Athens.
Democratic governance is a systematic project, not reflected in a voting action is democracy., the Athenians, as a nation advocating wisdom, deeply uphold the belief that group decision-making based on collective wisdom is more correct.
secondary title
Group decision making and collective intelligence
Therefore, this time it is further extended that voting, as a means of democratic governance, has a further deep meaning of belief in group decision-making and confidence in collective wisdom. We analyze from five levels why the Athenians can trust group decision-making, which is the key to the democratic voting system and the core of democratic culture;
1. The natural abilities and formal education of ordinary Athenians
As a well-known politician and orator in ancient Athens, Aeschines once publicly declared that the Athenians were born with more brains than other nations, so they could naturally make better laws. To a certain extent, the Athenians’ trust in collective decision-making is because the Athenians believe that their own is smarter than other nations. This is a kind of collective identity formed by the superiority of wisdom. Of course, not to mention whether Athenians are really born smart, but ordinary Athenians can be strengthened through formal schools, and the educational environment in Athens has also nurtured the wisdom of Athenians on collective decision-making since childhood.
It has to be said that the Athenians' trust in collective decision-making actually requires a long education. For Chinese DAOs, the collective consciousness in the Chinese education experience emphasizes obedience and unity, rather than trust in collective wisdom. This is fundamentally different.
2. Education in political practiceAthenian citizens had a rich education in political practice. For example, as mentioned in "Elite and Mass in Democratic Athens",
"The citizen's first formal experience of a democracy is when he is brought before the members of the commune to whom he belongs, and the latter vote him to be a citizen. The political structure of the commune, in theory and practice, is based on the Modeled on the city-state polity," the Citizens' Assembly was a testing ground for what Woodhead called "fundamental principles" of "public decision-making and responsibility." "In fact,Athenian citizens exist as a testing ground for hierarchical participation in governance,
Citizens have the opportunity to deal with and cooperate with different groups. This testing ground enables citizens to observe all aspects of the democratic regime extensively and closely, and cultivates the basic quality of citizen self-government.
3. The normative role of the city-state system
The role of the city-state system and norms is not only the public norms followed by the citizens of Athens, but also the beliefs in the hearts of the citizens of Athens. These beliefs are the core of Plato and Aristotle’s political thought. The citizens of Athens firmly believe that only a good city-state can lead to a good life, and it is the moral responsibility of the citizens of Athens to maintain and improve the atmosphere of the city-state. The ethos of the city-state should be reflected in the system of the city-state and be maintained by the system, that is, the system of the city-state should become a reflection of good morality.The citizens of Athens firmly believed that the city-state system was helpful to improve the quality education of citizens, and played a good role in regulating the moral behavior of citizens.
The laws must be as fair and democratic as possible, and the decisions made by the assemblies and popular courts have a powerful edifying effect, because good decisions make all citizens better and bad decisions change them. Just imagine, joining the citizens' assembly and the people's court in the ruling of special cases, so that the traitors get wealth and honor, and the honest people who contribute their personal wealth for the public interest are treated badly, then it may cause every citizen to become bad , thus destroying the beautiful atmosphere of the city-state.
4. Wisdom of Crowds
The Athenian people's trust in collective decision-making is based on the premise that the collective wisdom of a large group is greater than the wisdom of its components, and this concept is also one of the core principles of equality in Athenian political ideology. If we further dig into its deep logic, then the maintenance of collective wisdom is the maintenance of political consciousness, and the maintenance of this political consciousness is the defense of its own rights as citizens.
It is obvious that the development of Athenian democracy was full of antagonistic debates. In fact, even though Plato was one of the founders of the Academy of Athens, his views on democracy are not very well-documented. Plato clearly opposed decision-making groups made up of individuals who lacked professional skills and educational experience. Plato believed that ordinary citizens who lacked political ability and knowledge carried out collective decision-making rulings, coupled with various Athenian oratory appeals to political appeals. It is easy to cause democracy to become a chaotic and disorderly political system. Other elite orators in Athens believed that the masses had the right to despise professional research anyway, and that the masses were the best judges of correct policy, because this was the source of equality.The orator's appeal to the collective wisdom of a particular group was based on Athenians' general trust in the knowledge, experience, and collective judgment of citizens.
The orators and jurors in Athens emphasized the ideology that collective wisdom lies above individual knowledge, and the collective wisdom of the masses must be the ultimate master, rather than the truth in the hands of a few.
The law of the Athenians is the embodiment of the wisdom of the masses, and the law is the embodiment of the collective wisdom of the masses. It is neither something external to the opinions of the people, nor should it be a restriction on the opinions of the people. Law was considered by the Athenians to be an incomplete expression of some of the people's most cherished, time-tested ideals. In fact, the wisdom of the Athenians is the interpretive grammar of the laws of the Athenians, and it is often the boundaries of collective wisdom that determine the scale of the law.
5. Orator and OratoryThe maintenance of a democracy depends on ideological unity among the citizen population,
There are various powerful political orators in the democratic activities in Athens. We can clearly see that orators play an important role in collective wisdom. Orators usually master superb oratory skills to gain the approval of the public. Through speeches and debates to the public , so that the public can reach a consensus of position and consciousness, and then promote the ruling of relevant decisions.
*Quoted from "Elite and Mass in Democratic Athens"
secondary title
History of the city-state of Athens
We have seen from history that Athenian democracy is only suitable for small countries with few people in peacetime, because in the heyday of Athens, there were only tens of thousands of citizens, and only a part of citizens actively participated in democratic governance activities. According to Lin's book "The Light of Civilization in Ancient Greece", the estimated number is only a few thousand. Athenian democracy shaped a desirable society during its glorious period. However, the instability and discontinuity of Greek civilization, including the decentralized nature of the Greek city-state system, is not conducive to the long-term, stable and sustainable development of civilization. The background of Athenian democracy is restricted Due to the constraints of blood and geography, it is impossible to live in peace with foreigners and slaves, and conflicts between different classes erupt from time to time...The decline of Athenian democracy is due to many factors. However, the governance system of Athenian democracy has historical reference value. Practitioners in the DAO field must add historical premise when talking about Athenian democracy, otherwise the democracy in the classical period Discussing the system on the organization of modern society is biased.
We need to explore the causes and consequences of its democratic system and analyze the establishment and operation mechanism of its democratic system under the historical premise.Indeed, voting is not at the heart of Athenian democracy, the establishment of the Athenian democratic system depends on the historical conditions precipitated by the Greek city-states,first level title
02
secondary title
Inherent Beliefs in Governance Mechanisms
We generally believe that Athenian democracy allows everyone to enjoy the same power and dignity, and everyone has the right to express their opinions and vote choices. Collective governance should be based on the free will of citizens and equal elections. Therefore In terms of political ethics, the Athens city-state advocates freedom, the rule of law, democracy, and equality. Citizens' active participation in social governance helps maintain the institutional atmosphere of the city-state and enables the people of Athens to live a happy and beautiful life.
In terms of operational means, Athens democracy ensures the rights and freedoms of every citizen through the formulation, implementation, and review of laws, and prevents the abuse and malicious operation of power. The Athenian democratic system allows citizens to actively participate in social governance through elections, proposals, and voting. These means are also our current common means in DAO governance.In fact,Governance means are the expression form and functional service of belief.
The core of Athenian democracy comes from the trust in collective wisdom, and Plato’s philosopher king is the highest worship of Athenian democratic governance, a symbol of wisdom that transcends the collective and represents the collective. Athens democracy advocates the freedom and diversity of thought, advocates the collision and fusion of different viewpoints, debates with an inclusive attitude, and allows more thoughts to be integrated into the governance of social order, thus forming a Greek city-state full of wisdom.Wisdom is the highest belief of the Athenians, from which a prosperous culture and a democratic society are derived.
If the core of Athens' democracy is not the admiration of wisdom, but the worship of powerful force, then it will become a military-oriented city-state like Sparta.We return to our basic definition of DAO, a digital organization based on a blockchain network and governed by smart contracts. If you put aside smart contracts and on-chain governance, then the democratic action of DAO’s proposal-voting can also be implemented in the Web2 era, but it is impossible for us to recognize such an organization as a DAO.
In our current Web3 era, what we really trust is the smart contracts on the chain, not the collective wisdom.Our belief in collective intelligence does not exist here. It is because we confuse governance methods and inner beliefs that the industry's governance framework for DAO cannot be opened to a new page.
secondary title
sovereign socialist democracyThe social value of DAO lies in the realization of a social collaboration in which the execution process is open and transparent, and the rules cannot be artificially tampered with.The essence of social collaboration is to mobilize social productivity and production resources, and to improve production efficiency through reasonable allocation. andThe function of smart contracts in social collaboration is the definition, confirmation and execution of production relations and production materials.
The smart contract defines the rules and conditions of collective recognition, and confirms the rights of the production relationship based on the blockchain network, and ensures the reliability of the execution of the collaboration process.From the perspective of social cooperation,The functional role of smart contracts is the core logic of DAO democracy, which is different from the core logic of Athens democracy.
Secondly, from the perspective of the social system, the democratic nature of DAO, whether it is capitalist democracy, socialist democracy, or communist democracy... The nature is a fundamental issue, which determines the future direction of DAO democracy. How DAO will shape the future social form and system presentation in the future.
In fact, although the idea of personal sovereignty is surging in the encrypted world, individual rights come from collective empowerment and constraints. Individual rights without collective empowerment are outside the social system, and individual rights without social security cannot Through circulation and exchange, it becomes the accumulation of personal social assets.This point of view stems from what I believe to be the return movement of data ownership in Web3 and the dialectical inheritance of scientific socialism. Sovereign socialism is a socialist revolution based on the digital proletariat of the digital society. The significance of this revolution is to liberate Internet users from the central Internet platform of digital capitalism.
secondary title
The difference in the nature of DAO
As an autonomous organization on the chain, DAO needs to distinguish the two discussion contexts of Crypto and Web3. For example, DAO in the Defi field is mainly about investment management rather than production activities. We can understand the operation logic of Crypto-based DAO through DAICO, and DAICO can be used as a paradigm representative of DAO.
DAO based on Web3 involves the property rights relationship of production activities and production materials, not just the governance relationship at the financial level. The DAO concept of Web3 is to realize the autonomous organization of social activities. These social activities include life and work, and the entire development path tends to include infinitely close to real social activities.The cognitive trend of DAO is the constituent unit of the digital social form, or the basic unit of the Web3 social network.
secondary title
Legitimacy of Layered Governance ArchitectureThrough the above description, we can make it clear that the on-chain governance of DAO requires the design of a layered architecture. The DAO democracy based on the Web3 era is a sovereign socialist democracy, which means allowing the emergence of social representatives, which means entrusting agents The demand for legitimacy of governance methods such as human governance and market planned economy has emerged,
Therefore, our definition of the democratic nature of DAO also provides legal legitimacy for the hierarchical governance structure of DAO.
Among them, the constraints and empowerments of DAO are realized based on smart contracts, which largely avoids the emergence of corruption. Differences in governance power between different levels of relationships are often the root of corruption, and it is the smart contracts on the chain that filter out all possible corruption. possible human intervention. In the period of classical democracy, it was impossible to avoid the influence of human intervention in this process.
secondary title
Smart Contracts Empower Individual Sovereignty
In the conventional DAO governance mechanism, based on the proposal-voting method, it is the embodiment of a practical democratic system. Through the above analysis of Athenian democracy, this is the belief in collective wisdom in the classical period, which is different from the core of our current belief in DAO.
The real sovereign ability that DAO gives us is to grasp the ability to define and confirm the production relationship based on smart contracts, and then realize the protection of assets by the treasury based on DAO. In the past, the achievement of this ability must rely on the central deconstruction of authority. Participating in voting is the right to participate in public governance, which is different from customizing production relations and confirming rights.
The right to participate is the means of classical democracy, and the right to define is the soul of digital democracy.
We can analyze from two different perspectives, who is the real representative of the return of individual sovereignty
past--
Proposers need to write a proposal expressed in text, and the DAO’s internal community votes to pass the implementation plan. The engineer creates a smart contract and establishes a production relationship on the chain for automatic execution;
future--
The proposer directly initiates a smart contract proposal through natural language, and broadcasts authorization to the DAOs network, and the AI strategy assists in screening to provide the optimal match;In the future, everyone will have the ability to customize contract programming, and the deep meaning behind it is the ability to actively build production relationships on the chain.Individuals continue to form the definition and confirmation of collaborative relationships, forming a blockchain network based on smart contracts, enabling us to achieve large-scale collaboration on the chain.
secondary title
Credible right confirmation network based on DAOs network
In the past proposal-voting DAO governance logic, it was a governance logic that could not expand consensus externally. It could not form an open external cooperation relationship, but it was easy to form internal interest conflicts and contradictions. This is the limitation of traditional democracy. , Institutional defects hinder the initiative of development. In the era of sovereign individuals, everyone is endowed with the ability to define the rights of production relations, which means that DAO has become a unit that establishes the relationship of rights, and can realize the connection between relationship construction and relationship through DAO according to the individual's subjective wishes , and thus form an open DAOs network.An open DAOs network based on the value concept of personal sovereignty has formed a global collaborative network in line with the common development wishes of mankind.
Democracy based on the Web3 network actually means proposing a new global democratic solution, rather than a democracy limited to small countries with few people.
Balaji's definition of a cyber-state is: A cyber-state is a highly coherent online community with the capacity for collective action that can be crowdfunded globally and ultimately diplomatically recognized by a pre-existing state. While I don’t necessarily endorse this theory, it underpins the unanimous view that the formation of a sovereign network is the sovereign socialist democracy that a network of DAOs will form on a global scale.Due to individual differences in the DAOs network, it will also lead to differences in the ability of DAOs to build relationships, so it will formA network system with hierarchical structure and differential order pattern,
first level title
03
secondary title
The advantage of DAOs is the production flywheel
My original text:
ChatGPT：
Since DAO is a form of collaborative organization for the new generation of human beings, it means that we propose to DAO that DAO should achieve better production efficiency compared with traditional organizations, and the democracy of DAO is only an auxiliary means to serve this purpose. For example, the DAO of the DAICO paradigm has efficient fundraising capabilities on a global scale. Although there are imperfections and risks, this capability is not available to traditional financial institutions, and may never be available.
Since DAO is a form of collaborative organization for the new generation of human beings, our expectation for DAO is that it can achieve better production efficiency than traditional organizations. The democratic system of the DAO exists only as an auxiliary means to achieve this goal. For example, the DAO of the DAICO paradigm has the ability to raise funds efficiently on a global scale. Although there are some shortcomings and risks, this ability is not possessed by traditional financial institutions, and may never be possible.Our pursuit of DAO is a collaborative organization that can integrate network resources and configure social production relations more efficiently than traditional organizations. Therefore,
We need to define the production flywheel model of DAO, which is used to intuitively guide us how to improve the production efficiency of DAO.
The production flywheel of DAO should contain the following characteristics
1. Thread cooperation: single-thread or multi-thread, enter the barrier-free high-speed channel;
2. Reduce interruptions: Whether it is voting interaction or other audits, it is an increasing link;
3. Positive feedback: support feedback and incentives in the execution process;
4. Real-time tuning: Real-time adjustment and optimization can be performed based on the network on the chain
I posted the above passage to ChatGPT and got some good advice
Then, according to the definition of DAO's production flywheel, a scenario description is carried out
secondary title
Business Architecture of DAO Flywheel
In the flywheel model of DAO, we will design the business according to the project system. From the business structure, we will carry out a simple three-tier business relationship according to the business execution unit, business decision-making module, and business role unit. Through the decision-making module, role units are assigned, execution units are defined, and role units are designated to participate in a certain execution unit.
During the execution of a project, if there are a large number of voting actions that need to be confirmed repeatedly, it will greatly affect the production efficiency. Therefore, the execution rules should be defined according to the project formulation, as well as the potential judgment logic and response plan as much as possible, and integrated into the business decision-making module. So for the role unit, it basically forms the execution unit as the execution path, and the decision-making module provides execution assistance to complete efficient thread work.in,The decision-making module can introduce AI such as ChatGPT to make instant judgments of predefined rules and avoid a large number of interruption nodes in the task execution process.
The reference of the decision-making module means that the frequency of voting interaction is reduced, and there is no need to participate in voting during business execution.
Asynchronous collaborative network in flywheel mode
In the flywheel mode of DAO, the business units/units/modules are controlled by a series of contracts, so the start of the business from 0 to 1, and the iterative optimization of the business are a set of smart contracts in the business thread iterate in. In order to verify the validity and applicability of the contract, it is unlikely to be used by all employees at the beginning, or used on a large scale. In order to take into account the buffer of the verification business and ensure the cold start execution of the business, we need to introduce an asynchronous collaborative business Co-creation network, this business network can be divided into three stages
Early stage: Screening based on member network
Mid-term: optimization based on business network
Late stage: collaborative network-based execution
Starting from the most basic execution, decision-making, and role as three groups of smart contracts, we establish a DAO to start and verify the feasibility. The DAO is composed of a small group of expert members. Test, and screen out verified and feasible smart contract groups, and enter the business network.
In the business network, we start from the most basic smart contract to verify the adaptability to the business, and improve the relevant requirements from it. For example, we operate the flywheel mode of DAO around three sets of basic smart contracts. In order to reduce interruption and information synchronization, we found that the decision-making module needs to add a new knowledge system to accumulate common experience and knowledge, and based on business collaboration. Problems found in the process, and gradually establish a risk control mechanism based on the knowledge system. As a result, our business structure, after the optimization of the business network, has formed a business of at least 5 dimensions
business execution unit
business role unit
business decision module
business knowledge system
Business Risk Control Mechanism
With the optimization and improvement of the business network, a relatively complete DAO productivity flywheel business structure has been continuously established. The maturity of the business means the implementation of large-scale landing applications. Therefore, we can deploy this set of business contracts based on the DAO interoperability protocol In the entire DAOs network, large-scale application execution is realized.
It is based on the establishment of the above-mentioned layered governance structure that we have a basis to build an asynchronous collaborative business co-creation network with a layered structure.
Although it may be a network problem or a ChatGPT processing problem, the relationship between the five businesses is not fully described in the summary at the end of the paragraph, but the relationship between the described part of the business is correct, which is what I want to express. Secondly, the business execution unit can be a set of smart contracts, which is also the functional feature that I want to focus on. It also helped me to express and supplement, which is really good.
secondary title
The interaction in the co-creation collaboration forms the governance order
The business co-creation model based on DAO's production flywheel can gradually form a governance mechanism for the large-scale application of DAO. Smart contracts form an interactive structure of social production based on business logic, and realize high-frequency iterations of consensus in the interaction, thereby forming a widely executable order.Just as speeches and debates are the interactive structure of the democratic order in Athens, the interactive structure of business production based on the human-computer interaction of smart contracts forms the interactive structure of the DAO governance mechanism.The creation of a DAO starts from zero to one, so the early governance order is co-generated based on social interaction, rather than improving the governance order through proposal-voting.
The interaction structure is the key to generating social order, which I will explain in detail in the next article.
As mentioned above, due to the characteristics of the DAOs network in the hierarchical structure and differential order pattern, the rule establishment of the governance mechanism should also include the establishment of rules in three dimensions.
meta rules
public rules
custom rulesBased on the business decision-making module of DAO's productivity flywheel, it reviews and matches custom contracts.
therefore,therefore,We have changed the proposal-voting DAO governance mechanism, and ChatGPT provides us with the automatic ability to write requirements, automatically create and deploy smart contracts based on natural language.
With the deepening of our collaboration on the chain, our custom initial contracts will gradually form a set of contracts, multiple sets of contracts, and further merge multiple sets of contracts into a large contract cluster classification, and define it as a specific contract Modules, which address specific business needs. With the increase of business complexity, a smart contract scheduling system will be needed to help us efficiently deal with the work tasks in DAOs network collaboration.In the custom smart contract group, everyone's execution unit is given corresponding governance conditions in the evaluation and review of the decision-making module.
Everyone will be able to participate in the collaboration of the DAOs network with mission objectives, execution rules and cooperation authority, and eventually form an open large-scale free collaborative DAOs network that emerges from the bottom up.The governance mechanism of DAO depends on the formation path of the governance order. The formation of the governance order is the result of network co-creation. AI plays the role of referee and coach in the decision-making module, and the meta-rules hidden under the public rules and governance rules, In the form of the underlying protocol, it acts as a non-interferable Tiandao system for the DAOs network.
secondary title
Case Demo: Implementing DAO's Non-Voting Governance Mechanism Through ChatGPT
We currently conduct proposal explanations and complete voting through online meetings/online forums in the community, and the formation of the governance mechanism based on the business co-creation model can be based on ChatGPT through IM dialogues and in the form of Feed information flow Presenting the process of co-creation, the formation of the governance mechanism must be based on the formulation of rules formed in the collective interaction of human-computer interaction, and the integrity of the governance mechanism is completed in a specific space.
We temporarily introduce the concept of DAO OS, as the underlying support system of DAO-related businesses mentioned in this article, to realize the construction of DAO's productivity flywheel, DAO's business module system, DAO's asynchronous collaboration network, and then realize the customization of DAO Decision-making with no-voting governance mechanisms.
*Note: The following example is only the actual demonstration path of ChatGPT, and does not represent the real product development path. This demonstration is based on the theory and business above, based on the fuzzy design of ChatGPT, and the specific fields may not be accurate
First, we need to create the basic functions of a DAO OS. A DAO can be created based on the DAO OS, which is the most basic functional requirement;
Ask it to generate an executable code
At present, I don't know what functions the DAO OSbeta version contains, so I can let chatGPT tell me.
OK, now I finally know what the basic functions of DAO OS are. Next, we will introduce the business requirements of DAO to generate flywheels. Next, we will add the business system of DAO OS to meet the needs of business modules;
Here you can further request to convert this set of business models into 5 sets of smart contract modules and write codes;
So what functions does the current DAO OS Beta 1.0 have, I need to further clarify
After roughly defining the business module, we further asked it to implement the three-tier governance structure of DAO. ChatGPT gave different answers, including a description of the three-tier governance of meta rules, public rules, and custom rules, that is, learning As a result of the content in the interaction above.
In the meta-rule architecture, a new network protocol is added based on DAO OS to realize the interoperability between DAO and DAO
In the framework of public rules, design a task system that can be seamlessly migrated and used in any DAO
Design an AI decision-making system based on the public rule framework;
Based on the custom rule structure, design a function that can freely initiate contracts. Since I am not clear about the function, I ask AI to help me sort out the function.
Ask the AI for a summary of features
Finally, let AI conduct a summary analysis and a judgment on business prospectsIn fact, we can completely based on the mind map,By performing more refined Q&A on the above requirements, ChatGPT will provide output content with finer granularity and higher logical relevance.
This is only a preview of the actual measurement display, but the effect is actually quite shocking. As for the usability of the code, it needs to be planned on the test environment. In the development of the product DAO OS, I will also try real usability with my technical partners.
All in all, ChatGPT has almost revolutionized the production method of Internet products. I think it is feasible to develop product MVP based on ChatGPT. All entrepreneurial teams should embrace ChatGPT as soon as possible and build their own spellbooks.
Spellbook for this demo test
1. Let's create a DAO OS, which can realize the basic functions of creating and operating a DAO
2, the answer is awesome, please create your answer to DAO OS into an executable code program, and define this version as DAO OS beta version
3. Please use a secondary directory to describe the functions of the DAO OS Beta version.
4. In order for DAO OS to support business activities, we need to introduce the business model of the DAO growth flywheel. Do you still remember the characteristics and business model of the DAO growth flywheel?
5. Please add the business model of the DAO growth flywheel as the business system of DAO OS Beta, and generate 5 sets of smart contract modules of the business system according to the functions of the 5 business models, and define this version as DAO OS beta_1.0
6. Please output the codes of the above 5 sets of smart contracts and integrate them into the code of the DAO OS Beta version, and define the improved code as DAO OS Beta 1.0,
7, please fully describe the specific functions of the current DAO OS Beta 1.0 version, and use the 2-level directory to describe
8. Combined with the above, please fully plan the three-tier governance structure of DAO, and introduce the functions and describe the scenarios
9. Please establish a network protocol system at the meta-rule layer of DAO OS to support the interoperability of underlying data between DAO and DAO, including economic activities, communication, asset transactions, business cooperation, etc., and integrate the network protocol The code shows
10. Please establish a task OKR system in the public rules of DAO OS. This OKR system can realize the seamless migration and use of task collaboration in any DAO. Please describe this functional requirement in the 2-level category, and Show the relevant code writing.
11. In the public rule framework of DAO OS, establish an AI decision-making system, which is used to evaluate the allocation and scheduling of task systems. Please describe the functional requirement through the 2-level directory, write the code of this functional requirement, and display it.
12. In the custom rule layer of DAO OS, please establish a function for customizing business requirements. This function allows any member of DAO to initiate a smart contract and submit it to the DAO protocol network to obtain the opportunity for task collaboration. Since I am not particularly clear about this requirement, please help me sort out the relevant functions, including your suggestions, and please output the result as a description form of the 2-level directory.
13. Please summarize all the functions of the above DAO OS, including the functions of DAO OS Beta 1.0, and display them according to the level 2 category
15, please analyze the advantages of DAO OS, and talk about the commercial value and future prospects of DAO OS
04
first level title
Through the research output of this paper, it shows the use of ChatGPT from theory to code, from theoretical analysis and innovative design to code implementation. There are still flaws and inaccuracies in the output process, but if you spend more time on systematic and refined questions, you will get higher usability.
We don't have to worry about ChatGPT eliminating content creators. ChatGPT is an auxiliary tool for in-depth content creators. Although the current version of training data is up to 2021 and not connected to the Internet, it is very worth looking forward to when one day GPT 4-based Internet-based The paid version of ChatGPT (to ensure computing performance) has officially come out. I believe that the usability in the professional field will reach a new level, and it will directly become our daily productivity system. Even a professional version that costs thousands of dollars a month is worth it. Buy any company.
For most innovative output activities in non-cutting-edge fields, the current version of ChatGPT is fully capable of providing highly usable content, and ChatGPT is fully capable of serving most content creators. I have to feel that Web3 and AIGC go hand in hand, and we have really ushered in a golden age of content creators.
Welcome to DAOs to World's innovative research content output group
1. Practitioners in any professional field with certain output ability and strong interest in Web3&AICG;
2. The group will conduct in-depth communication and guidance on content creation based on ChatGPT, as well as regular mutual learning and communication;
3. Based on interdisciplinary research methods, we will carry out innovative research and output related propositions from academic theory to business development;
Benefits of joining a group
1. The output content of the team members will be guided by content optimization, mastering the output optimization of weapons in the new era;
2. The research output articles will be published through the Web3Caff research section, as well as the promotion of operation channels;
3. Team members who complete the research proposition can obtain the paid membership benefits of the Web3caff research section for free, and read other paid content of the research section;
4. Team members who have completed in-depth article creation will hold a space to communicate and disseminate content, and release a commemorative NFT
Realization of joining the group
1. In-depth research on the impact of the promotion of articles through Web3Caff channels and Twitter activities, and the revenue sharing of paid membership conversions can be obtained;
3. Participate in the writing of DAOs to World's Web3 brand courses, provide monetization services for course training, etc.
secondary title
Introduction to DAOs to World
DAOstoWorld is an organization dedicated to exploring and building the DAOs network. It is a business cooperation organization that focuses on cash flow business. It does not easily toss about projects. The establishment of each business must establish a clear business model. The basic cash flow and future index income are consistent. It needs to be designed well, and the re-aggregation resources will be gradually started. At this stage, it is in the cash flow business exploration period. The current main business is specializing in the Web3 brand market. Like-minded friends are welcome to join.
